Picture a retirement community designed for maintenance-free living and whole-person wellness: personal trainers, a fully equipped fitness center, yoga and meditation sessions, saltwater lap pools, and more. Add on a bistro and coffee shop, a gourmet chef using local ingredients, nature trails, a library and computer center, continuing education classes, opportunities for community projects, and a variety of resident-led clubs and activities. Now imagine that same community also provides a range of healthcare options on-site—from a health clinic to assisted living and a 24-hour healthcare center—so residents can receive appropriate care if their needs change.
For many, a community like this sounds ideal: comfortable living today with a clear plan for future needs. These places already exist and are commonly called life plan communities, sometimes still referred to as continuing care retirement communities (CCRCs).
Top-tier life plan communities that anticipate the preferences of the next generation of retirees offer many of these amenities and add even more. Despite their appeal, residents of life plan communities make up only a small portion of the overall retirement market in the United States. Why is that?
Part of the reason is cost. Delivering a broad range of services and amenities is expensive, so many traditional life plan communities tend to serve wealthier retirees. That narrows the market, but the industry is exploring ways to reach the middle market while remaining financially viable. Options include lower-cost, a la carte fee models that let residents pay only for what they use. Some developers may scale back luxury features while focusing on the resident experience and partnering with local organizations to provide services.
>> Related: The Voice of the Resident: Why the Senior Living Industry Should Listen
Prospects’ first impressions
Beyond cost, the industry faces a deeper challenge: perception. Despite the vibrant lifestyle many life plan communities promote, many consumers still equate CCRCs with “retirement homes,” a phrase historically associated with nursing homes. Why? Consider this common scenario.
A CCRC opens and quickly fills, attracting retirees in their mid-60s and early 70s. Fast-forward 25 years: many original residents are now in their 80s and 90s. Some remain active and independent; others use walkers or scooters but stay socially engaged; some receive care in assisted living or the healthcare center.
When a younger, active couple in their early 70s visits that community looking for a maintenance-free lifestyle, their first impression can shape their decision. They might notice longtime residents using mobility aids near the entrance and instantly feel they’re not ready to join. The sight reinforces the idea that the community is for much older people, even if the community offers a full, energetic lifestyle.
This perception becomes self-reinforcing: if CCRCs are widely seen as places for the very old, applicants will skew older, and communities will age in place, making it harder to attract younger, healthier residents. That trend is a significant obstacle for life plan communities seeking a more balanced resident mix.
>> Related: What Will Retirement Communities Look Like in the Future?
A tough question to answer
This challenge is not unique to CCRCs, though it can be more pronounced where skilled healthcare facilities are visible on site. Hiding residents who need more care is not an acceptable solution; most communities rightly value every resident regardless of health status. People using mobility devices or receiving assistance still contribute meaningfully to community life. Until broader societal views on aging shift, however, the perception problem will persist.
Attitudes about aging do change, however. As noted by psychology professor Ellen Langer, a mindset that equates aging with decline makes reminders of age feel negative. Conversely, viewing later life as a continuation of vitality—“80 is the new 60”—can make retirement communities appealing when they cultivate an active, engaged atmosphere.
Communities can take creative steps to attract younger retirees: targeted discounts for new residents under a certain age, incentive programs, or fresh marketing that emphasizes active lifestyles rather than care needs. Other innovations might include tiered pricing, partnerships with local fitness and cultural organizations, flexible service bundles, and programming designed for younger retirees’ interests.
A life plan community—with its amenities, services, and long-term peace of mind—should be an easy sell. To reach a broader, younger, and healthier demographic, the industry must innovate in pricing, programming, and marketing, and continue promoting the full, active lives that modern life plan communities can support.